Treier writes, “… the more focus placed on the human author (s) as opposed to the text (s), the more potentially problematic diversity one seems to find” (Introducing Theological Interpretation of Scripture, 113).
Okay. This is right. Dealing with authors primarily individualizes texts and books and therefore blurs the unity of the Bible. There are different languages, styles, concepts. This is an obvious result of the grammatical-historical approach and was counter-acted by the redemptive-historical approach (111).
But what if, in some way, the diversity of the Bible is part of its unity in that it was not absent in the mind of the authors as they penned the individual books? Can we understand inspiration to involve some grasp of the human authors that they were working in the midst of a more holistic project? If you say no, then why not?
The individual biblical authors understood the meaning of the canon as they wrote their individual books. A high view of God, of Scripture, of inspiration could lead to such an assumption, or presupposition. And it is one that I do not think is careless to affirm.


